Showing posts with label Trademark. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Trademark. Show all posts

Saturday, September 5, 2020

APPLE v. PEAR: Trademark Opposition

 Are you confused by the source of services represented by these logos?


 

        v.       Trademark image

 

Apple recently opposed an application for U.S. Federal trademark registration of a pear logo design owned by Super Healthy Kids, Inc. The applicant owning the pear design has been pursuing registration for its trademark in connection with (1) a software application to organize and plan meals, evaluate nutritional content, create a recipe database, and manage purchasing ingredients; and (2) an online social network in the field of cooking, food and nutrition.


Apple’s mark is undisputedly a famous one. The major question (without reciting the entire opposition) for the U.S. PTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board is whether the pear design “readily calls to mind” Apple’s logo and creates a similar commercial impression so as to cause a likelihood of confusion between the source of each mark’s products and services or to cause a consumer to believe applicant’s services are affiliated with or endorsed by, Apple.


Apple’s Notice of Opposition can be viewed HERE. Discovery has begun and this dispute may go well in late 2021 if not resolved between the parties.

 

Applicant has taken the dispute to social media. Applicant’s principal, Russell Monson, has asked consumers to sign a petition requesting that Apple drop its opposition against his company. The petition can be viewed HERE.  

 

While the petition will unlikely have any bearing in the opposition itself, such petitions might be a novel way of conducting surveys of consumers – if questions are carefully and neutrally posed – to become a less expensive way of conducting survey evidence to determine whether there is a a likelihood of confusion between trademarks. Further, if Mr. Monson gains enough signatures, will Apple be swayed into withdrawing the petition? Time will tell…

 

As of the date of this writing, the petition has 231,465 signatures.

 

Nothing herein should be considered legal advice. If you have a legal question, please consult a qualified legal practitioner.

Wednesday, April 4, 2018

What Constitutes An Appropriate Specimen?

Selecting a good specimen is vital to a viable trademark application.

Whether you are filing a specimen with a "use-based" trademark application or filing a specimen in conjunction with an allegation of use subsequent to the initial trademark application, there are some clear requirements. The list below is not meant to include all possible types of specimens, but will provide guidance on the most common permissible specimens.
  • If you are selling a product, a possible specimen is a photograph of the product or label placed on the product. 
    • A digital printout of the label (or drawing of the label) is likely to be denied by the USPTO as it is not the label as actually affixed to the product.  
  • If you are selling a product, another possible specimen is a screenshot from a website catalog detailing the product and the trademark with a way to purchase the product by placing it in a "cart." This is true for mobile applications as well. A possible specimen would be the download page for the software app, detailing the mark, and describing the software as detailed in the trademark application.
  • If you are selling software as a service (SAAS), the U.S. Patent and Trademark office must see the trademark on the SAAS as viewed by the customer. Advertising for the software is not sufficient. 
    • A possible specimen is a screenshot of the SAAS, as viewed by the customer, showing the trademark in a footer or header. 
      • Specimens have been denied when the trademark is a navigation button.
    • Another possible specimen is a screenshot of the login page for the SAAS bearing the trademark.
  • If you are providing a service (other than software), advertising for the service is acceptable as long as the specimen clearly describes the services as detailed in the trademark application. Examples include, screenshots of a website page bearing the mark and describing the services provided, a menu (for a restaurant), and an agenda (for training or workshops).
The information herein is for informational and educational purposes only. If you have legal questions or concerns, please consult a qualified legal practitioner.

Monday, May 16, 2016

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office: Trademark Application Process

Trademark Application Process

Once you file a U.S. trademark application with the Patent and Trademark Office, the application follows a standard examination process. The below list is not meant to cover every contingency, but is a broad outline of the application process.
  • Application filed. 
    • In the event the mark is capable of different spellings or pronunciations, the PTO may issue a Notice of Pseudo Mark. For e.g., if the mark is URGR8, a pseudo mark may issue for "YOUR ARE GREAT." A pseudo mark has no legal significance, does not represent any formal examination of the application, and does not appear on any registration.  
    • In the event the mark contains design features, the PTO may issue a Notice of Design Search Codes. Again, this Notice does not represent a formal examination of the application, but it does appear in searches and on certificates of registration. 
    • Once an examiner is assigned to the application (3-4 months after filing), the applicant may discuss the above notices with the examiner if the applicant believes the Notices are incorrect. There is no formal dispute procedure for these Notices.
  • The assigned examiner reviews the trademark application 3-5 months after the filing date & issues an Office Action or Examiner Amendment if issues need to be resolved.  
    • If an applicant has filed a trademark application without legal counsel and receives a 2(d) refusal stating that the application is rejected as being confusingly similar to a pre-existing registration or application, it is time to obtain legal counsel to assist applicant in (1) determining if a response is appropriate and (2) drafting that response .
    • The applicant has 6 months to respond to an Office Action. Failure to respond will result in abandonment of the application .
    • Examiner Amendments can often be handled by a telephone conversation with the examiner.
  • Notice of Publication issues once (if) all issues raised by the examiner are resolved. 
    • If the PTO rejects a Response to Office Action and a Final Refusal is received, an applicant may request reconsideration or appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB).
  • The trademark application is published in U.S. PTO¹s Official Gazette for 30 days to allow individuals or entities a chance to object to registration of the mark.
  • The application receives another short review if no objections are received during the publication period.
    • If the application is not yet in use in interstate commerce, the application will receive Notice of Allowance in due course (1-3 months after publication).
    • Applicant has 36 months from the issuance of the Notice of Allowance to file a Statement of Use detailing use of the mark in connection with the services detailed in the application (an Extension of Time must be filed every 6 months if no use has occurred).
  • After publication, and interstate use of the mark is claimed (either in the original filing or through an acceptable, later-filed, Statement of Use), a Certificate of Registration will issue in due course.  
  • Between the 5th and 6th year after registration, a registrant must file an Affidavit of Continuing Use along with a specimen showing use of the trademark in connection with each class of products/services in which the mark is registered. During this time, the registrant may also file an Affidavit of Incontestability. There is a 6 month grace period to file the Affidavit of Continuing Use, but not the Affidavit of Incontestability.  
    • The Affidavit of Incontestability only needs to be filed once and it can only be filed at 5 year intervals of registration.
  • Between the 9th and 10th year after registration, and every 10 years thereafter, the registrant must file a Request to Renew and an Affidavit of Use (again, along with a specimen showing use of the trademark in connection with each class of products/services in which the mark is registered). A 6-month grace period exists to file the Renewal Request and Affidavit of Continuing Use.
    • At this time, an Affidavit of Incontestability may also be filed if it was not filed previously.
This blog is for informational purposes only and is not to be considered legal advice. If you have a particular legal problem, please consult with a qualified practitioner to discuss your rights. 

© 2016-2026, Judith Keene ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Monday, April 11, 2016

First Steps: What Is A Trademark? -- and How Can You Protect Your Brand?




Judith A. Keene, Esq. is Senior Counsel at HolzerIPLaw, PC. Practicing since 1987, she has assisted her clients with the creation, protection, and maintenance of their intellectual property issues.

April 11, 2016


First Steps: What is a trademark?

-- and How Can You Protect Your Brand?

You have a name, a product, or an idea … while these may be intangible, they represent your intellectual property - the unique character of your business. They are yours and yours alone, and like business owners the world over, you want to keep them that way.

A well-designed and well-researched intellectual property program helps to safeguard your names, trademarks, products, business information, and ideas against infringement or copying by others. It can also save your business valuable time and money in the event a name or idea is already taken.

Through this blog I hope to clarify many of the issues that new clients have when they come to my office in order to make it easier to create protectable brands ...and to maintain them.

***

Categories of Trademarks

A trademark (or service mark) is a word and/or design by which the purchasing public identifies the source of a product (or service).  A mark represents all the quality and goodwill developed by the owner.  A word and/or design for which trademark protection is claimed falls into one of four categories:

*  Arbitrary or Fanciful
*  Suggestive
*  Descriptive
*  Generic

A general understanding of these categories is important in choosing a trademark possessing protectable characteristics. An arbitrary or fanciful trademark receives the greatest protection because it is least likely to be confused with another origin.  It means nothing in the context in which it is used (e.g., "Apple®" computers or "Kodak®" film).  Suggestive marks are equally registrable and suggest a quality or ingredient of the product or service (e.g., "Caterpillar®" tractors).  Such marks require imagination to associate the mark and its meaning.

Descriptive marks are more generally understood to describe the products they represent (e.g., "The Breathable Mattress" for mattresses).  If a trademark examiner at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) deemed a mark descriptive, it may be denied registration or be granted limited registrability on the Supplemental Trademark Register (as opposed to the Principal Register).  After 5 years of continuous use, such a mark may (or may not) then achieve registration on the Principal Register by an application for that purpose.

Confusing Similarity

A trademark is protectable if, when used with a particular good or service, consumers are not likely to confuse it as coming from a different, source.  If such a “confusingly similar” pre-existing trademark, company name, or trade name exists, and the chosen mark is likely to cross paths with any of these pre-existing names or marks, the mark should not be utilized.  The mark first utilized in interstate commerce is the mark with senior rights.

Registration

A mark is protected upon creation in the U.S.; however, registration of a mark provides benefits that may not be otherwise available.  Use in only one state without any sales across state lines relegates registration to the Secretary of State in which the mark is used.  Use across state lines opens up the possibility for registration with the U.S. Patent and Trademark office. (PTO).  More information can be obtained at the PTO website.

Registration in some other countries is also possible through the U.S. PTO as the U.S. is a member certain treaties that permit such applications. In certain circumstances, this type of trademark application for registration is beneficial, however, a careful analysis of a trademark owner’s needs must be made before determining whether this application is sufficient, or if a direct application with the country of interest is more appropriate.

Use of a Mark

A mark should always be utilized as an adjective with either a TM or SM placed next to the mark if the mark is not registered with a national registrar (as opposed to a state registrar).  The company name and address should also appear somewhere on any written materials as well. Finally, efforts should be continuously made to stop junior confusingly similar uses of marks. Failure to properly utilize and protect a mark could result in loss of all protection for that mark. Some examples of trademarks that have lost protection are “Monopoly,” “Aspirin,” “Escalator,” and “Cellophane.”



Please note that this material should not be considered legal advice and is for informational purposes only. If you have specific legal questions, you should consult a qualified legal professional skilled in the area of trademark law. If you would like more information about this topic, please contact Judith A. Keene, Esq. at (720) 684-5375 or by email at jkeene@holzeriplaw.com.